Model comparison

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Llama 3-8B

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 Tencent

37.9

Rank #193 Confirmed

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.5

Rank #344 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3-8B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 35.6 to 8.8.
  • Llama 3-8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Llama 3-8B specifications
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 3-8B
ProviderTencentMeta
Noometry Index37.925.5
Released—2024-04-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1234

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 3-8B
LMArena Coding12701152
BigCodeBench Instruct—31.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—36.9%
HumanEval+—56.7%
MBPP+—54.8%

Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 3-8B
LMArena Hard Prompts12641133
Chess Puzzles—0%
DTBench—43.9%
Adversarial NLI—57.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—116.45
ForecastBench—58.6
WinoGrande—75.7%

Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 3-8B
LMArena Math12741151
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—1.9%
MATH Level 5—6.1%

Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 3-8B
LMArena Expert12481113
GPQA Diamond—26.1%
ARC (AI2) Challenge—82.8%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—82.6%
TriviaQA—67.7%

Multilingual Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 3-8B
LMArena Non-English12621098
LMArena Chinese13191076
LMArena Russian12581109
LMArena French—1159
LMArena German—1104
LMArena Japanese—967
LMArena Korean—1004
LMArena Spanish—1173

Instruction Following Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 3-8B
LMArena Instruction Following12451127

Long Context Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 3-8B
LMArena Longer Query13011128

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 3-8B
LMArena Text12741166
LMArena Creative Writing12421150
LMArena Multi-Turn12751152

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Llama 3-8B?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Llama 3-8B better for coding?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Llama 3-8B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-8B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper