Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Hunyuan Large Vision
Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Large Vision leads 32.8 to 9.6.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 37.0 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322), Hunyuan Large Vision: 37.6 (#176)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1307 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216), Hunyuan Large Vision: 23.8 (#160)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1257 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309), Hunyuan Large Vision: 32.8 (#184)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1269 |
Knowledge Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287), Hunyuan Large Vision: 33.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1250 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.1 (#79)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 40.1 (#216)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1289 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1243 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 66.0 (#210)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1250 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.8 (#184)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1279 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.7 (#211)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1250 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1253 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Hunyuan Large Vision?
Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?
Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Hunyuan Large Vision share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.