Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads 35.4 to 10.2.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 37.7 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | 2024-08-13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 37.0 (#199)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1269 |
Reasoning Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 24.8 (#159)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1255 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 35.4 (#185)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1265 |
Knowledge Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.9 (#200)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1238 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.4 (#208)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1257 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1262 |
| LMArena French | — | 1286 |
| LMArena German | — | 1273 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1213 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1195 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1261 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1279 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.5 (#220)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1245 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1266 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.3 (#211)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1281 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1265 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13?
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better for coding?
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17.