Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs GLM-5V-Turbo
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 39.4 to 10.2.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 43.8 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1401 |
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1466 |
Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1443 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1441 |
Knowledge GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1452 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1416 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1488 |
| LMArena French | — | 1444 |
| LMArena German | — | 1423 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1431 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1450 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1423 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1438 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1432 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than GLM-5V-Turbo?
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or GLM-5V-Turbo better for coding?
GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and GLM-5V-Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5V-Turbo has 19.