Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs ERNIE 5.1
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
BaiduSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 40.3 to 10.2.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | ERNIE 5.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Baidu |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 43.8 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1488 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, ERNIE 5.1: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | — | 1227 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 23.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1481 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1481 |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads
Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1492 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1454 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1508 |
| LMArena French | — | 1488 |
| LMArena German | — | 1470 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1422 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1459 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1473 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1460 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1462 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | ERNIE 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1468 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1441 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1471 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than ERNIE 5.1?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or ERNIE 5.1 better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and ERNIE 5.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and ERNIE 5.1 has 19.