Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Gemini Advanced 0514
Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini Advanced 0514 leads 32.9 to 9.6.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Gemini Advanced 0514 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 37.1 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322), Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.0 (#202)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1255 |
Reasoning Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216), Gemini Advanced 0514: 23.6 (#163)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1248 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309), Gemini Advanced 0514: 32.9 (#181)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1272 |
Knowledge Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287), Gemini Advanced 0514: 32.7 (#201)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1215 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.8 (#187)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1274 |
| LMArena French | — | 1306 |
| LMArena German | — | 1275 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1242 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1232 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1283 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1242 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.2 (#206)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1254 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#202)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1254 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.8 (#195)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1284 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1269 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Gemini Advanced 0514?
Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Gemini Advanced 0514 better for coding?
Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Gemini Advanced 0514 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17.