Model comparison
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b vs Qwen3 Coder Next
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- Qwen3 Coder Next accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.3 | 33.8 |
| Released | 2024-10-24 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 262K |
| Max output | 4K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 Coder Next leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 34.3 (#227), Qwen3 Coder Next: 35.8 (#206)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1197 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 22.3 (#183), Qwen3 Coder Next: 21.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1193 | — |
Math Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 31.4 (#195), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1200 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 32.6 (#202), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1182 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 38.5 (#225), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1213 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1210 | — |
| LMArena French | 1247 | — |
| LMArena German | 1199 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1158 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1193 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 62.9 (#232), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1196 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 37.2 (#215), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1228 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 42.4 (#230), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1224 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1200 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1190 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is C4ai Aya Expanse 32b better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is C4ai Aya Expanse 32b or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 34.3 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3 Coder Next does, with 262K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do C4ai Aya Expanse 32b and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. C4ai Aya Expanse 32b has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.