Model comparison

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b vs o1-mini

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b Cohere

35.9

Rank #221 Confirmed

o1-mini OpenAI

34.0

Rank #235 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. C4ai Aya Expanse 32b scores higher in 1 category and o1-mini in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads 23.3 to 8.8.
  • C4ai Aya Expanse 32b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b and o1-mini specifications
C4ai Aya Expanse 32bo1-mini
ProviderCohereOpenAI
Noometry Index35.934.0
Released2024-10-242024-09-12
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1839

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 34.8 (#231), o1-mini: 35.5 (#224)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 32bo1-mini
LMArena Coding11971362
Aider Polyglot—32.9%
WeirdML—36.3%
LiveBench Coding—48%
HumanEval+—89%
MBPP+—78.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: —, o1-mini: 24.6 (#118)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 32bo1-mini
Cybench—10%

Reasoning C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 23.3 (#180), o1-mini: 8.8 (#346)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 32bo1-mini
LMArena Hard Prompts11931333
ARC-AGI-2—0.8%
SimpleBench—18.1%
ARC-AGI-1—14%
LiveBench Reasoning—72.3%
LiveBench Data Analysis—57.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—135.82
LiveBench—57.8%

Math o1-mini leads

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 34.0 (#197), o1-mini: 35.4 (#186)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 32bo1-mini
LMArena Math12001358
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—46.9%
LiveBench Math—62%
MATH Level 5—89.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge o1-mini leads

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 33.2 (#206), o1-mini: 34.9 (#192)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 32bo1-mini
LMArena Expert11821316
GPQA Diamond—62.4%
Confabulations—18.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.9%—

Multilingual o1-mini leads

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 38.4 (#230), o1-mini: 43.6 (#182)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 32bo1-mini
LMArena Non-English12131289
LMArena Chinese12111314
LMArena French12481293
LMArena German11991278
LMArena Japanese11631245
LMArena Korean11581223
LMArena Russian12271283
LMArena Spanish11931303

Instruction Following o1-mini leads

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 62.6 (#237), o1-mini: 66.7 (#206)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 32bo1-mini
LMArena Instruction Following11961304
LiveBench Instruction Following—65.4%

Long Context o1-mini leads

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 37.2 (#220), o1-mini: 40.1 (#161)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 32bo1-mini
LMArena Longer Query12281320

Writing & Preference o1-mini leads

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 42.2 (#235), o1-mini: 48.4 (#202)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 32bo1-mini
LMArena Text12241317
LMArena Creative Writing12001244
LMArena Multi-Turn11901314
Short-Story Creative Writing—64.9%
LiveBench Language—40.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is C4ai Aya Expanse 32b better than o1-mini?

C4ai Aya Expanse 32b is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is C4ai Aya Expanse 32b or o1-mini better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (34.8 vs 35.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do C4ai Aya Expanse 32b and o1-mini share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. C4ai Aya Expanse 32b has 18 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper