Model comparison
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b vs Falcon-180B
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. C4ai Aya Expanse 32b scores higher in 4 categories and Falcon-180B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads 38.4 to 25.2.
Side by side
| C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Falcon-180B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Technology Innovation Institute |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 32.2 |
| Released | 2024-10-24 | 2023-09-06 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 34.8 (#231), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1197 | — |
Reasoning C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 23.3 (#180), Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1193 | 1007 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.13 |
| HellaSwag | — | 89% |
| LAMBADA | — | 79.8% |
| PIQA | — | 84.9% |
| WinoGrande | — | 87.1% |
Math Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 34.0 (#197), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1200 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 54.4% |
Knowledge Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 33.2 (#206), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1182 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 67.8% |
| BoolQ | — | 89% |
| MMLU | — | 70.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 64.2% |
Multilingual C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 38.4 (#230), Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1213 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1211 | — |
| LMArena French | 1248 | — |
| LMArena German | 1199 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1158 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1193 | — |
Instruction Following C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 62.6 (#237), Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1196 | 1047 |
Long Context Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 37.2 (#220), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1228 | — |
Writing & Preference C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 42.2 (#235), Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1224 | 1054 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1200 | 1089 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1190 | 1013 |
Frequently asked questions
Is C4ai Aya Expanse 32b better than Falcon-180B?
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do C4ai Aya Expanse 32b and Falcon-180B share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. C4ai Aya Expanse 32b has 18 scored results on Noometry and Falcon-180B has 16.