Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
NVIDIASummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads 43.4 to 29.1.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 35.9 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1223 |
Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 23.5 (#177)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1203 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 34.6 (#193)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1230 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.9 (#218)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1167 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.1 (#241)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1181 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1180 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1187 |
Instruction Following Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 62.9 (#233)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1201 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#230)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1205 |
Writing & Preference Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.4 (#229)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1228 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1213 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1227 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12.