Model comparison
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b vs Pixtral Large
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads 42.2 to 32.9.
Side by side
| C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Pixtral Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 32.2 |
| Released | 2024-10-24 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 128K |
| Max output | 4K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 34.8 (#231), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1197 | — |
Reasoning C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 23.3 (#180), Pixtral Large: 21.7 (#218)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1193 | — |
Math Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 34.0 (#197), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1200 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 33.2 (#206), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1182 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: —, Pixtral Large: 30.6 (#111)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1089 |
Multilingual Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 38.4 (#230), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1213 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1211 | — |
| LMArena French | 1248 | — |
| LMArena German | 1199 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1158 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1193 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 62.6 (#237), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1196 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 37.2 (#220), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1228 | — |
Writing & Preference C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 42.2 (#235), Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#278)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1224 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1200 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 988 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1190 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is C4ai Aya Expanse 32b better than Pixtral Large?
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 128K tokens.
How many benchmarks do C4ai Aya Expanse 32b and Pixtral Large share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. C4ai Aya Expanse 32b has 18 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral Large has 3.