Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Mistral Small 3.2
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 4 categories and Mistral Small 3.2 in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 35.1 to 26.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 31.5% for Gemma 3n E4b IT and 40.4% for Mistral Small 3.2.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Small 3.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 31.2 |
| Released | — | 2025-06-20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.0938 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | — |
Reasoning Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | 40.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 131.74 |
Math Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |
Knowledge Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 49.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | — |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Mistral Small 3.2?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Mistral Small 3.2 share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.