Noometry

Model comparison

Amazon Nova Pro vs Step 3.7 Flash

Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Amazon Nova Pro Amazon

31.0

Rank #281 Confirmed

Step 3.7 Flash StepFun

37.3

Rank #207 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 42.9 to 28.5.
  • Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.18 / $1.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.80 / $3.20 for Amazon Nova Pro.
  • Amazon Nova Pro accepts more context: 300K tokens versus 256K.
  • Step 3.7 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova ProStep 3.7 Flash
ProviderAmazonStepFun
Noometry Index31.037.3
Released2024-12-032026-05-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window300K256K
Max output10K256K
Input $ / M tokens$0.80$0.18
Output $ / M tokens$3.20$1.11
Results tracked385

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3.7 Flash leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229), Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProStep 3.7 Flash
SciCode—40%
LiveBench Coding38.1%—
LMArena Coding1270—
ALE-Bench—694.12

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147), Step 3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProStep 3.7 Flash
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard25%—
TheAgentCompany1.7%—

Reasoning Step 3.7 Flash leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243), Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProStep 3.7 Flash
NYT Connections (extended)—39.7%
CritPt—2.3%
LiveBench Reasoning32.6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1246—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index123.8—
LiveBench43.5%—

Math Step 3.7 Flash leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243), Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProStep 3.7 Flash
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—68.5%
Omni-MATH24.2%—
LiveBench Math38%—
LMArena Math1252—

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250), Step 3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProStep 3.7 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam4.4%—
MMLU-Pro67.3%—
Confabulations30.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.1%—
GPQA (HELM)44.6%—
LMArena Expert1211—
MMLU82%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126), Step 3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision980—

Multilingual Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223), Step 3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1234—
LMArena Chinese1244—
LMArena French1271—
LMArena German1243—
LMArena Japanese1200—
LMArena Korean1203—
LMArena Russian1240—
LMArena Spanish1182—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226), Step 3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProStep 3.7 Flash
LiveBench Instruction Following67.1%—
IFEval81.5%—
LMArena Instruction Following1235—

Long Context Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205), Step 3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1255—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226), Step 3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1259—
LMArena Creative Writing1212—
Short-Story Creative Writing60.5%—
WildBench77.7%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1246—
LiveBench Language37%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Pro better than Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Pro or Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.18 per million input tokens and $1.11 per million output tokens; Amazon Nova Pro lists at $0.80 and $3.20.

Is Amazon Nova Pro or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Amazon Nova Pro does, with 300K tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and Step 3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper