Model comparison
Amazon Nova Lite vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 35.5 to 26.3.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 300K | — |
| Max output | 10K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.24 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 32.5 (#270), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1239 | 1314 |
| LiveBench Coding | 27.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 236.25 | — |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 19.3 (#260), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1220 | 1299 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 36.7% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 37.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 36.4% | — |
Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 27.8 (#247), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1227 | 1298 |
| Omni-MATH | 23.3% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 36.7% | — |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 26.3 (#259), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1201 | 1289 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 3.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 60% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39.7% | — |
| MMLU | 77% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Lite: 25.5 (#123), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 990 | — |
Multilingual Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 38.0 (#232), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1208 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1225 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1229 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1153 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1216 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1237 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1153 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1226 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 59.3 (#255), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1205 | 1275 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 54.1% | — |
| IFEval | 77.6% | — |
Long Context Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 37.4 (#217), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1234 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 42.1 (#237), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1197 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1199 | 1299 |
| WildBench | 75% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Lite better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Lite or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Lite and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Lite has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.