Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 vs DeepSeek LLM 67B

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek LLM 67B DeepSeek

24.9

Rank #347 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and DeepSeek LLM 67B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads 42.3 to 7.0.
  • DeepSeek LLM 67B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and DeepSeek LLM 67B specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10DeepSeek LLM 67B
ProviderAmazonDeepSeek
Noometry Index44.524.9
Released—2023-11-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1215

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 43.9 (#82), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10DeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Coding14831096

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 30.1 (#86), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10DeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Hard Prompts14581070
Chess Puzzles—0%
Epoch Capabilities Index—110.5

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 39.3 (#109), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10DeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Math14381108
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—0.8%
MATH Level 5—6.4%

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 42.3 (#97), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10DeepSeek LLM 67B
GPQA Diamond—24.6%
LMArena Expert1506—

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 54.0 (#50), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10DeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Non-English14341073
LMArena Chinese14631132
LMArena Russian1423—

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 75.2 (#69), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10DeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Instruction Following14271079

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 44.0 (#77), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10DeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Longer Query14411092

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 61.8 (#84), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10DeepSeek LLM 67B
LMArena Text14481105
LMArena Creative Writing13681067
LMArena Multi-Turn14421082

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 better than DeepSeek LLM 67B?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 or DeepSeek LLM 67B better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and DeepSeek LLM 67B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper