Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 vs Llama 13b

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

Llama 13b Meta

23.9

Rank #344 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 13b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads 62.0 to 13.9.
  • Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Llama 13b specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Llama 13b
ProviderAmazonMeta
Noometry Index43.823.9
Released—2023-02-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1221

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 43.2 (#81), Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Llama 13b
LMArena Coding1483683

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 28.9 (#84), Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Llama 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts1458728
BIG-Bench Hard—37.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—100.09
HellaSwag—79.2%
LAMBADA—75.2%
PIQA—80.1%
WinoGrande—73%

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 36.6 (#108), Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Llama 13b
LMArena Math1440838
GSM8K—20.6%

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 41.6 (#98), Llama 13b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Llama 13b
LMArena Expert1505—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—52.7%
BoolQ—78.7%
MMLU—47.7%
OpenBookQA—56.4%
TriviaQA—77.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: —, Llama 13b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Llama 13b
ScienceQA—43.3%

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 54.3 (#48), Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Llama 13b
LMArena Non-English1435819
LMArena Chinese1465—
LMArena Russian1423—

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 75.3 (#66), Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Llama 13b
LMArena Instruction Following1426781

Long Context Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 44.0 (#73), Llama 13b: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Llama 13b
LMArena Longer Query1441—

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 62.0 (#80), Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10Llama 13b
LMArena Text1449834
LMArena Creative Writing1369794
LMArena Multi-Turn1442753

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 better than Llama 13b?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 or Llama 13b better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.2 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and Llama 13b share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper