Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs Qwen Turbo
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads 38.5 to 15.3.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.8 | 27.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#96), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 28.9 (#98), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1415 | — |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 38.5 (#136), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1404 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 40.3 (#120), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1444 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.2 (#126), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1381 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1372 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1390 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 72.9 (#126), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1381 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#119), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1400 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.4 (#129), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1380 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than Qwen Turbo?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.