Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Qwen1.5-72B

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Qwen1.5-72B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.3

Rank #282 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 38.6 to 11.5.
  • Qwen1.5-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Qwen1.5-72B specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen1.5-72B
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index42.330.3
Released—2024-02-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1222

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 41.5 (#112), Qwen1.5-72B: 31.4 (#272)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Coding14301166
BigCodeBench Instruct—33.2%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.3%
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—61.6%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 28.1 (#93), Qwen1.5-72B: 21.2 (#201)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Hard Prompts14271148

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 36.1 (#130), Qwen1.5-72B: 30.7 (#205)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Math14181164

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.6 (#133), Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#295)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Expert14091136
GPQA Diamond—28.8%

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.7 (#103), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.4 (#248)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Non-English13991135
LMArena Chinese14401186
LMArena Russian13971104
LMArena French—1158
LMArena German—1084
LMArena Japanese—1061
LMArena Korean—1049
LMArena Spanish—1110

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.4 (#117), Qwen1.5-72B: 59.6 (#251)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Instruction Following13871142

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#120), Qwen1.5-72B: 35.0 (#238)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Longer Query13911157

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.7 (#104), Qwen1.5-72B: 37.4 (#253)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Text14201166
LMArena Creative Writing13511137
LMArena Multi-Turn14091160

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Qwen1.5-72B?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Qwen1.5-72B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper