Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs GPT-4 Turbo
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 8 categories and GPT-4 Turbo in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 38.9 to 9.0.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 30.5 |
| Released | — | 2023-11-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $30 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.2 (#110), GPT-4 Turbo: 33.8 (#249)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | 1268 |
| WeirdML | — | 18% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 48.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 58.2% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 86.6% |
| MBPP+ | — | 73.3% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: —, GPT-4 Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| METR Time Horizons | — | 36.7% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 29.3 (#94), GPT-4 Turbo: 15.3 (#317)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | 1251 |
| SimpleBench | — | 25.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 6% |
| DTBench | — | 61.6% |
| LMCA | — | 9.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 127.25 |
| ForecastBench | — | 59.4 |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.9 (#124), GPT-4 Turbo: 9.0 (#322)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1419 | 1272 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 0.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.7% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 46.7% |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 39.2 (#136), GPT-4 Turbo: 24.3 (#268)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1408 | 1223 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.6% |
| Confabulations | — | 28.4% |
| MMLU | — | 81.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: —, GPT-4 Turbo: 30.6 (#110)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1090 |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.4 (#108), GPT-4 Turbo: 40.5 (#216)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1245 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | 1242 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1259 |
| LMArena French | — | 1276 |
| LMArena German | — | 1259 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1194 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1187 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1260 |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.2 (#123), GPT-4 Turbo: 65.8 (#216)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1249 |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#125), GPT-4 Turbo: 38.0 (#206)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | 1254 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.5 (#110), GPT-4 Turbo: 47.7 (#206)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1350 | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | 1267 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than GPT-4 Turbo?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or GPT-4 Turbo better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and GPT-4 Turbo share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4 Turbo has 36.