Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Phi-4 Mini
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 42.2 to 28.1.
- Phi-4 Mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Phi-4 Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 30.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-12-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.075 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.2 (#110), Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 10.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | — |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 29.3 (#94), Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | — |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.9 (#124), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1419 | — |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 39.2 (#136), Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1408 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.4 (#108), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.2 (#123), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#125), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.5 (#110), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1350 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Phi-4 Mini?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Phi-4 Mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.