Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Falcon-180B
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation InstituteSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 4 categories and Falcon-180B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 59.7 to 29.3.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Falcon-180B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Technology Innovation Institute |
| Noometry Index | 42.3 | 31.8 |
| Released | — | 2023-09-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 41.5 (#112), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | — |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 28.1 (#93), Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | 1007 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 111.89 |
| HellaSwag | — | 89% |
| LAMBADA | — | 79.8% |
| PIQA | — | 84.9% |
| WinoGrande | — | 87.1% |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 36.1 (#130), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1418 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 54.4% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.6 (#133), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1409 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 67.8% |
| BoolQ | — | 89% |
| MMLU | — | 70.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 64.2% |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.7 (#103), Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1399 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1397 | — |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.4 (#117), Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1047 |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#120), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | — |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.7 (#104), Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1054 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1351 | 1089 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | 1013 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Falcon-180B?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Falcon-180B share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Falcon-180B has 16.