Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Laguna M.1
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
PoolsideSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 36.1 to 20.3.
- Laguna M.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Laguna M.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Poolside |
| Noometry Index | 42.3 | 31.9 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 41.5 (#112), Laguna M.1: 36.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1348 |
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | — |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 28.1 (#93), Laguna M.1: 21.9 (#187)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 36.1 (#130), Laguna M.1: 20.3 (#276)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 0% |
| LMArena Math | 1418 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.6 (#133), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1409 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.7 (#103), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1399 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1397 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.4 (#117), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#120), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.7 (#104), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Laguna M.1?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or Laguna M.1 better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Laguna M.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Laguna M.1 has 3.