Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs MiMo-V2-Pro
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation InstituteSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.9 to 29.3.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 42.4 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.4 (#76)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1476 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266), MiMo-V2-Pro: 21.3 (#200)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 36.7 (#104)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1447 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 40.8 (#106)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1479 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.9 (#77)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1455 |
| LMArena French | — | 1470 |
| LMArena German | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1401 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1458 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.2 (#46)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1444 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#133)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1455 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.9 (#67)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1456 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and MiMo-V2-Pro share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.