Noometry

Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 vs Granite 3.0 2b Instruct

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 Amazon

42.4

Rank #101 Confirmed

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct IBM

30.2

Rank #284 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads 59.0 to 29.8.
  • Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Granite 3.0 2b Instruct
ProviderAmazonIBM
Noometry Index42.430.2
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1713

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 41.6 (#109), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.8 (#311)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Granite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Coding14331090
BigCodeBench Instruct—20.5%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 27.9 (#94), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 19.6 (#234)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Granite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14221073

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 36.4 (#116), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.7 (#215)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Granite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Math14311117

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.3 (#122), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.4 (#238)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Granite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Expert14321064

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 52.1 (#91), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.1 (#273)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Granite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14051033
LMArena Chinese14631070
LMArena Russian13951045
LMArena French1449—
LMArena German1396—
LMArena Japanese1383—
LMArena Korean1387—
LMArena Spanish1444—

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 73.4 (#118), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 54.2 (#279)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Granite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13871056

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.5 (#116), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#263)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Granite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13951071

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 59.0 (#109), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.8 (#287)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Granite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Text14151080
LMArena Creative Writing13491046
LMArena Multi-Turn13801053

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 better than Granite 3.0 2b Instruct?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 or Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 27.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper