Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 vs Qwen1.5-72B

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Qwen1.5-72B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.8

Rank #285 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads 39.9 to 11.5.
  • Qwen1.5-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and Qwen1.5-72B specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Qwen1.5-72B
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.030.8
Released—2024-02-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1722

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.3 (#107), Qwen1.5-72B: 31.9 (#277)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Coding14331165
BigCodeBench Instruct—33.2%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.3%
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—61.6%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 29.1 (#95), Qwen1.5-72B: 22.2 (#203)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Hard Prompts14221148

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.1 (#114), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#205)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Math14311164

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.9 (#127), Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#300)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Expert14311136
GPQA Diamond—28.8%

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 51.9 (#98), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#253)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Non-English14051135
LMArena Chinese14631186
LMArena French14491159
LMArena German13951084
LMArena Japanese13831061
LMArena Korean13841050
LMArena Russian13941104
LMArena Spanish14441110

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 73.2 (#122), Qwen1.5-72B: 59.3 (#256)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Instruction Following13871141

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.5 (#121), Qwen1.5-72B: 35.1 (#243)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Longer Query13951157

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 58.8 (#114), Qwen1.5-72B: 37.3 (#258)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Text14151166
LMArena Creative Writing13491137
LMArena Multi-Turn13801160

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 better than Qwen1.5-72B?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and Qwen1.5-72B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper