Model comparison
GPT-5.5 Instant vs Granite 3.0 2b Instruct
GPT-5.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.5 Instant scores higher in 7 categories and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.5 Instant leads 61.8 to 29.6.
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.5 Instant | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 42.7 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2026-05-05 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 44.3 (#74), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1433 | 1090 |
| SciCode | 48.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 20.5% |
Reasoning GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 24.9 (#155), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1426 | 1073 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 12% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.52 | — |
Math Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 26.5 (#259), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1420 | 1117 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 2.4% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 68.1% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 48.9 (#74), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1409 | 1064 |
| GPQA Diamond | 82.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Instant: 40.0 (#52), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1250 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1403 | — |
Multilingual GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 52.8 (#80), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1417 | 1033 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1070 |
| LMArena Russian | 1431 | 1045 |
| LMArena French | 1428 | — |
| LMArena German | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1429 | — |
Instruction Following GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 74.2 (#100), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1056 |
Long Context GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 43.4 (#96), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1070 |
Writing & Preference GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 61.8 (#85), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1419 | 1080 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1419 | 1046 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | 1053 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.5 Instant better than Granite 3.0 2b Instruct?
GPT-5.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5.5 Instant or Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better for coding?
GPT-5.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.5 Instant and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.5 Instant has 27 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13.