Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Step 3.5 Flash
Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
StepFunSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3.5 Flash in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Step 3.5 Flash leads 59.0 to 29.3.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Step 3.5 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2026-01-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Step 3.5 Flash: 41.7 (#106)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1436 |
Reasoning Step 3.5 Flash leads
Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266), Step 3.5 Flash: 21.2 (#202)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1411 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 28.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Step 3.5 Flash: 40.6 (#77)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 66.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1408 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Step 3.5 Flash: 39.0 (#127)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1422 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual Step 3.5 Flash leads
Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281), Step 3.5 Flash: 50.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1386 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1448 |
| LMArena French | — | 1421 |
| LMArena German | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1353 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1350 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1385 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1419 |
Instruction Following Step 3.5 Flash leads
Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281), Step 3.5 Flash: 73.3 (#119)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1385 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#112)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1402 |
Writing & Preference Step 3.5 Flash leads
Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290), Step 3.5 Flash: 59.0 (#108)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1403 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1357 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1405 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Step 3.5 Flash?
Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Step 3.5 Flash share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.