Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B Alibaba (Qwen)

42.1

Rank #119 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads 60.0 to 29.1.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B specifications
Falcon-180BQwen3.5 122B-A10B
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index32.242.1
Released2023-09-062026-02-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$3.20
Results tracked1627

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.1 (#162)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena WebDev—1360
SciCode—35.6%
LMArena Coding—1436

Reasoning Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 27.2 (#123)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Hard Prompts10071421
NYT Connections (extended)—51.7%
CritPt—0.9%
Thematic Generalization—51.2%
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—84.3%
LMCA—32.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13—
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.1 (#112)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Math—1432
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 38.8 (#142)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3.5 122B-A10B
Vectara Hallucination Rate—11.2%
LMArena Expert—1432
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.6 (#57)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Vision—1245

Multilingual Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 51.6 (#107)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Non-English10001400
LMArena Chinese—1462
LMArena French—1442
LMArena German—1426
LMArena Japanese—1367
LMArena Korean—1352
LMArena Russian—1400
LMArena Spanish—1424

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 73.8 (#115)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Instruction Following10471399

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 43.0 (#109)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Longer Query—1410

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 60.0 (#105)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Text10541417
LMArena Creative Writing10891368
LMArena Multi-Turn10131416

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Qwen3.5 122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper