Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Qwen3-4B
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 26.2 to 18.5.
- Qwen3-4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3-4B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.4 | 31.5 |
| Released | — | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 39.6 (#142), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1371 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.3 (#94)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 35.7% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 26.2 (#122), Qwen3-4B: 18.5 (#264)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | — |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen3-4B: 28.5 (#228)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 52.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 52.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.7% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.5 (#145), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1345 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.7 (#167), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1316 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.6 (#146), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 55.0 (#144), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1365 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1354 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Qwen3-4B?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Qwen3-4B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.