Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 54.7 to 46.7.
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.9 | 31.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $5.60 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 43 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 33.2 (#260)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1370 | 1292 |
| WeirdML | — | 16% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 55.9% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.1 (#133)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 5.7% |
| BALROG | — | 16.2% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 35.8% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.3 (#199)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1271 |
| DTBench | — | 62.9% |
| LMCA | — | 13.4% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 79.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 129 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.5 |
| HellaSwag | — | 84.8% |
| PIQA | — | 82.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 82.3% |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 19.3 (#287)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 33% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1283 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 63.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 27.0 (#253)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 49.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 63.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 19.1% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 42.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1245 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 94.5% |
| MMLU | — | 85.3% |
| TriviaQA | — | 71.9% |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 41.0 (#213)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1252 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1341 | 1272 |
| LMArena French | — | 1280 |
| LMArena German | — | 1234 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1180 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1188 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1256 |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 65.5 (#221)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1315 | 1254 |
| IFEval | — | 80.6% |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 38.9 (#188)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1333 | 1282 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 46.7 (#215)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1364 | 1269 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | 1221 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1355 | 1272 |
| WildBench | — | 80.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 33.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 43.