Model comparison

Qwen3-4B vs Solar Pro4

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3-4B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.9

Rank #264 Confirmed

Solar Pro4 Upstage

42.1

Rank #121 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Solar Pro4 leads 28.5 to 19.2.
  • Qwen3-4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen3-4B and Solar Pro4 specifications
Qwen3-4BSolar Pro4
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Upstage
Noometry Index31.942.1
Released2025-04-292026-08-06
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—524K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked618

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen3-4B: —, Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-4BSolar Pro4
LMArena WebDev—1371
LMArena Coding—1437

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100), Solar Pro4: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-4BSolar Pro4
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard35.7%—

Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads

Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-4BSolar Pro4
Chess Puzzles4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1399

Math Solar Pro4 leads

Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-4BSolar Pro4
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions38.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202552.2%—
LMArena Math—1416

Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads

Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-4BSolar Pro4
GPQA Diamond52.3%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.7%—
LMArena Expert—1427

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen3-4B: —, Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-4BSolar Pro4
LMArena Non-English—1361
LMArena Chinese—1415
LMArena French—1397
LMArena German—1364
LMArena Japanese—1309
LMArena Korean—1382
LMArena Russian—1360
LMArena Spanish—1401

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen3-4B: —, Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-4BSolar Pro4
LMArena Instruction Following—1377

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen3-4B: —, Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-4BSolar Pro4
LMArena Longer Query—1381

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen3-4B: —, Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-4BSolar Pro4
LMArena Text—1386
LMArena Creative Writing—1316
LMArena Multi-Turn—1385

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3-4B better than Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3-4B and Solar Pro4 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3-4B has 6 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper