Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Mistral Nemo
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 55.0 to 28.6.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Mistral Nemo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.4 | 25.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-07-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 39.6 (#142), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1371 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 26.2 (#122), Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | — |
| DTBench | — | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.63 |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 29.9% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.5 (#145), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1345 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.7 (#167), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1316 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.6 (#146), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | — |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 55.0 (#144), Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1365 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1354 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Mistral Nemo?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Mistral Nemo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.