Model comparison
Mistral Nemo vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 3.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Solar Pro4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
UpstageSummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Solar Pro4 leads 56.5 to 28.5.
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for Solar Pro4.
- Solar Pro4 accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 128K.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mistral Nemo | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 26.4 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2024-07-01 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | 524K |
| Max output | 128K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 10 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1437 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125), Solar Pro4: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |
Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads
Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1399 |
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.68 | — |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |
Math Solar Pro4 leads
Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1416 |
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |
Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads
Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1427 |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1415 |
| LMArena French | — | 1397 |
| LMArena German | — | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1401 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1377 |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads
Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1316 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1385 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Nemo better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 3.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Solar Pro4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemo or Solar Pro4?
Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Solar Pro4 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.
Which has the bigger context window?
Solar Pro4 does, with 524K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Solar Pro4 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.