Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs Mistral Nemo
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads 56.6 to 28.5.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Mistral Nemo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 26.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-07-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.6 (#123), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1412 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: —, Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 28.4 (#106), Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | — |
| DTBench | — | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.68 |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 39.0 (#119), Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1425 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 38.5 (#144), Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 29.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.5 (#131), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | — |
| LMArena French | 1425 | — |
| LMArena German | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1360 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1324 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1371 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1382 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.1 (#141), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1365 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#133), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1370 | — |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.6 (#136), Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1394 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1318 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1364 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than Mistral Nemo?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Mistral Nemo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.