Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs GPT-4.1 mini
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 5 categories and GPT-4.1 mini in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 26.2 to 10.9.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GPT-4.1 mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 41.4 | 33.5 |
| Released | — | 2025-04-14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 47 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 39.6 (#142), GPT-4.1 mini: 30.4 (#286)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1371 | 1367 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 23.9% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 32.4% |
| SciCode | — | 40.4% |
| WeirdML | — | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 48.9% |
| CadEval | — | 16% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, GPT-4.1 mini: 33.0 (#52)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 50.5% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 26.2 (#122), GPT-4.1 mini: 10.9 (#335)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1349 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 48.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 3.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 7% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| DTBench | — | 68.8% |
| LMCA | — | 21.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.01 |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, GPT-4.1 mini: 23.1 (#264)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 6.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 44.7% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 49.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1343 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 87.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 4.5% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, GPT-4.1 mini: 34.7 (#183)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 12.7% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 78.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 61.4% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1338 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, GPT-4.1 mini: 35.2 (#77)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1181 |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.5 (#145), GPT-4.1 mini: 45.9 (#161)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1341 | 1318 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1345 | 1329 |
| LMArena French | — | 1357 |
| LMArena German | — | 1349 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1291 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1298 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1324 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1319 |
Instruction Following GPT-4.1 mini leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.7 (#167), GPT-4.1 mini: 73.9 (#113)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1316 | 1332 |
| IFEval | — | 90.4% |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.6 (#146), GPT-4.1 mini: 31.8 (#270)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1344 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 44.4% |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 55.0 (#144), GPT-4.1 mini: 48.8 (#193)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1365 | 1341 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | 1300 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1354 | 1354 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1147 |
| WildBench | — | 83.8% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than GPT-4.1 mini?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or GPT-4.1 mini better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.6 versus 30.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and GPT-4.1 mini share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.1 mini has 47.