Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs GPT-4.1 mini
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher in 7 categories and GPT-4.1 mini in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads 27.3 to 10.9.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GPT-4.1 mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 33.5 |
| Released | — | 2025-04-14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 47 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.0 (#123), GPT-4.1 mini: 30.4 (#286)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1413 | 1367 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 23.9% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 32.4% |
| SciCode | — | 40.4% |
| WeirdML | — | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 48.9% |
| CadEval | — | 16% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: —, GPT-4.1 mini: 33.0 (#52)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 50.5% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 27.3 (#110), GPT-4.1 mini: 10.9 (#335)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 1349 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 48.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 3.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 7% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| DTBench | — | 68.8% |
| LMCA | — | 21.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.01 |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 36.2 (#121), GPT-4.1 mini: 23.1 (#264)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1425 | 1343 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 6.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 44.7% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 49.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 87.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 4.5% |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 37.8 (#142), GPT-4.1 mini: 34.7 (#183)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1385 | 1338 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 12.7% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 78.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 61.4% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: —, GPT-4.1 mini: 35.2 (#77)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1181 |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.7 (#127), GPT-4.1 mini: 45.9 (#161)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | 1318 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1405 | 1329 |
| LMArena French | 1426 | 1357 |
| LMArena German | 1391 | 1349 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1355 | 1291 |
| LMArena Korean | 1327 | 1298 |
| LMArena Russian | 1371 | 1324 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1381 | 1319 |
Instruction Following GPT-4.1 mini leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.3 (#136), GPT-4.1 mini: 73.9 (#113)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1365 | 1332 |
| IFEval | — | 90.4% |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#128), GPT-4.1 mini: 31.8 (#270)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1370 | 1344 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 44.4% |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.9 (#131), GPT-4.1 mini: 48.8 (#193)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1394 | 1341 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1318 | 1300 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1364 | 1354 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1147 |
| WildBench | — | 83.8% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than GPT-4.1 mini?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 or GPT-4.1 mini better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 30.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and GPT-4.1 mini share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.1 mini has 47.