Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Qwen1.5-110B

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Qwen1.5-110B Alibaba (Qwen)

34.2

Rank #234 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 54.7 to 38.0.
  • Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Qwen1.5-110B specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen1.5-110B
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index41.934.2
Released—2024-04-25
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked920

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Coding13701184
BigCodeBench Instruct—35%
BigCodeBench Complete—44.4%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Hard Prompts13561168
ForecastBench—57.7

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Math—1185

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Expert—1144

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Non-English13401142
LMArena Chinese13411206
LMArena French—1151
LMArena German—1123
LMArena Japanese—1074
LMArena Korean—1044
LMArena Russian—1118
LMArena Spanish—1142

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Instruction Following13151158

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Longer Query13331157

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Text13641175
LMArena Creative Writing13071148
LMArena Multi-Turn13551160

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Qwen1.5-110B share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper