Model comparison

Step 1o Turbo 202506 vs Step 3.5 Flash

Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Step 1o Turbo 202506 StepFun

39.7

Rank #160 Confirmed

Step 3.5 Flash StepFun

42.3

Rank #116 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Step 1o Turbo 202506 scores higher in 1 category and Step 3.5 Flash in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.5 Flash leads 42.6 to 36.6.
  • Step 3.5 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Step 1o Turbo 202506 and Step 3.5 Flash specifications
Step 1o Turbo 202506Step 3.5 Flash
ProviderStepFunStepFun
Noometry Index39.742.3
Released—2026-01-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—256K
Max output—256K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.30
Results tracked1419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3.5 Flash leads

Step 1o Turbo 202506: 39.2 (#160), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.4 (#105)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkStep 1o Turbo 202506Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Coding13391436

Reasoning Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads

Step 1o Turbo 202506: 26.8 (#129), Step 3.5 Flash: 22.2 (#202)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkStep 1o Turbo 202506Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts13351411
NYT Connections (extended)—28.4%

Math Step 3.5 Flash leads

Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.6 (#164), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.6 (#84)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkStep 1o Turbo 202506Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Math13181408
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—66.8%

Knowledge Step 3.5 Flash leads

Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.1 (#176), Step 3.5 Flash: 39.6 (#132)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkStep 1o Turbo 202506Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Expert13081421

Multimodal Not comparable

Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.1 (#80), Step 3.5 Flash: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkStep 1o Turbo 202506Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Vision1186—

Multilingual Step 3.5 Flash leads

Step 1o Turbo 202506: 45.3 (#173), Step 3.5 Flash: 50.5 (#119)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkStep 1o Turbo 202506Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Non-English13131385
LMArena Chinese13801447
LMArena German13141405
LMArena Russian13271385
LMArena French—1421
LMArena Japanese—1354
LMArena Korean—1352
LMArena Spanish—1419

Instruction Following Step 3.5 Flash leads

Step 1o Turbo 202506: 69.2 (#176), Step 3.5 Flash: 73.1 (#124)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkStep 1o Turbo 202506Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following13101385

Long Context Step 3.5 Flash leads

Step 1o Turbo 202506: 41.0 (#146), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#117)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkStep 1o Turbo 202506Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Longer Query13481402

Writing & Preference Step 3.5 Flash leads

Step 1o Turbo 202506: 53.1 (#160), Step 3.5 Flash: 58.8 (#113)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkStep 1o Turbo 202506Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text13361403
LMArena Creative Writing13071357
LMArena Multi-Turn13401405

Frequently asked questions

Is Step 1o Turbo 202506 better than Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Step 1o Turbo 202506 or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 39.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Step 1o Turbo 202506 and Step 3.5 Flash share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Step 1o Turbo 202506 has 14 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper