Model comparison
StarCoder 2 15B vs Step 1o Turbo 202506
Step 1o Turbo 202506 has enough public results to be ranked (#160); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
StepFunSummary
- StarCoder 2 15B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| StarCoder 2 15B | Step 1o Turbo 202506 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 37.5 | 39.1 |
| Released | 2024-02-20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
StarCoder 2 15B: 36.0, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 38.6 (#158)
| Benchmark | StarCoder 2 15B | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1339 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 38.4% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 37.8% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
StarCoder 2 15B: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 25.7 (#127)
| Benchmark | StarCoder 2 15B | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1336 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 104.61 | — |
| WinoGrande | 64.3% | — |
Math Not comparable
StarCoder 2 15B: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 33.9 (#163)
| Benchmark | StarCoder 2 15B | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1318 |
| GSM8K | 57.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
StarCoder 2 15B: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 35.5 (#174)
| Benchmark | StarCoder 2 15B | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1308 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 47.2% | — |
| MMLU | 64.1% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
StarCoder 2 15B: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 35.4 (#75)
| Benchmark | StarCoder 2 15B | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1186 |
Multilingual Not comparable
StarCoder 2 15B: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 45.5 (#168)
| Benchmark | StarCoder 2 15B | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1380 |
| LMArena German | — | 1315 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1327 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
StarCoder 2 15B: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 69.4 (#171)
| Benchmark | StarCoder 2 15B | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1311 |
Long Context Not comparable
StarCoder 2 15B: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 41.1 (#141)
| Benchmark | StarCoder 2 15B | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1350 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
StarCoder 2 15B: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 53.4 (#154)
| Benchmark | StarCoder 2 15B | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1336 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1308 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1341 |
Frequently asked questions
Is StarCoder 2 15B better than Step 1o Turbo 202506?
Step 1o Turbo 202506 has enough public results to be ranked (#160); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is StarCoder 2 15B or Step 1o Turbo 202506 better for coding?
Step 1o Turbo 202506 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do StarCoder 2 15B and Step 1o Turbo 202506 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. StarCoder 2 15B has 7 scored results on Noometry and Step 1o Turbo 202506 has 14.