Model comparison
GLM-4.5V vs StarCoder 2 15B
GLM-4.5V has enough public results to be ranked (#158); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASide by side
| GLM-4.5V | StarCoder 2 15B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 39.2 | 37.5 |
| Released | 2025-08-11 | 2024-02-20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 64K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.80 | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 38.9 (#152), StarCoder 2 15B: 36.0
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 38.4% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 37.8% |
Reasoning Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 26.5 (#118), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1335 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 104.61 |
| WinoGrande | — | 64.3% |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 34.7 (#157), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1353 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 57.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 36.8 (#155), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 47.2% |
| MMLU | — | 64.1% |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 33.6 (#86), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 44.9 (#172), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1304 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1338 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1299 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1335 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 69.4 (#170), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#166), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1305 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 52.7 (#162), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1333 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.5V better than StarCoder 2 15B?
GLM-4.5V has enough public results to be ranked (#158); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is GLM-4.5V or StarCoder 2 15B better for coding?
GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and StarCoder 2 15B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 15B has 7.