Model comparison
Solar Pro4 vs Wizardlm 13b
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Upstage
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Solar Pro4 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Solar Pro4 leads 56.5 to 30.5.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Solar Pro4 | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Upstage | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2026-08-06 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 524K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Solar Pro4 leads
Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Solar Pro4 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1437 | 1035 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1371 | — |
Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads
Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Solar Pro4 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1018 |
Math Solar Pro4 leads
Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Solar Pro4 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1416 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Solar Pro4 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1427 | — |
Multilingual Solar Pro4 leads
Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Solar Pro4 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1361 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1415 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1397 | — |
| LMArena German | 1364 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1309 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1382 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1360 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1401 | — |
Instruction Following Solar Pro4 leads
Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Solar Pro4 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1377 | 1048 |
Long Context Solar Pro4 leads
Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Solar Pro4 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1381 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads
Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Solar Pro4 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1386 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1316 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1385 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Solar Pro4 better than Wizardlm 13b?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Solar Pro4 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Solar Pro4 and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Solar Pro4 has 18 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.