Model comparison
GLM-4.5 vs Wizardlm 13b
GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5 leads 57.7 to 30.7.
Side by side
| GLM-4.5 | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 41.4 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2025-07-27 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 98K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.5 leads
GLM-4.5: 41.1 (#121), Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1434 | 1035 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 54.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 40.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 344.82 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.52 | — |
Reasoning GLM-4.5 leads
GLM-4.5: 27.7 (#99), Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1430 | 1018 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.9% | — |
Math GLM-4.5 leads
GLM-4.5: 36.3 (#119), Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1427 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
GLM-4.5: 35.5 (#172), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 11.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1433 | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.5 leads
GLM-4.5: 53.0 (#74), Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1417 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1423 | — |
| LMArena German | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1382 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1414 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1454 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-4.5 leads
GLM-4.5: 74.3 (#100), Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1405 | 1049 |
Long Context GLM-4.5 leads
GLM-4.5: 38.2 (#196), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1413 | 1054 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 58.3% | — |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.5 leads
GLM-4.5: 57.7 (#121), Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1430 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1395 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1415 | 1047 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.4% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1343 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.5 better than Wizardlm 13b?
GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.5 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
GLM-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.1 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5 and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5 has 27 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.