Model comparison

Solar Pro4 vs Step 3.5 Flash

Solar Pro4 and Step 3.5 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.1 vs 42.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Solar Pro4 Upstage

42.1

Rank #121 Confirmed

Step 3.5 Flash StepFun

42.3

Rank #116 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Solar Pro4 scores higher in 2 categories and Step 3.5 Flash in 6 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Solar Pro4 leads 28.5 to 22.2.
  • Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for Solar Pro4.
  • Solar Pro4 accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 256K.
  • Step 3.5 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Solar Pro4 and Step 3.5 Flash specifications
Solar Pro4Step 3.5 Flash
ProviderUpstageStepFun
Noometry Index42.142.3
Released2026-08-062026-01-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window524K256K
Max output131K256K
Input $ / M tokens$0.30$0.10
Output $ / M tokens$1.20$0.30
Results tracked1819

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3.5 Flash leads

Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.4 (#105)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkSolar Pro4Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Coding14371436
LMArena WebDev1371—

Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads

Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104), Step 3.5 Flash: 22.2 (#202)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkSolar Pro4Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts13991411
NYT Connections (extended)—28.4%

Math Step 3.5 Flash leads

Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.6 (#84)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkSolar Pro4Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Math14161408
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—66.8%

Knowledge Too close to call

Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129), Step 3.5 Flash: 39.6 (#132)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkSolar Pro4Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Expert14271421

Multilingual Step 3.5 Flash leads

Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139), Step 3.5 Flash: 50.5 (#119)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkSolar Pro4Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Non-English13611385
LMArena Chinese14151447
LMArena French13971421
LMArena German13641405
LMArena Japanese13091354
LMArena Korean13821352
LMArena Russian13601385
LMArena Spanish14011419

Instruction Following Too close to call

Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132), Step 3.5 Flash: 73.1 (#124)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkSolar Pro4Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following13771385

Long Context Too close to call

Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#117)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkSolar Pro4Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Longer Query13811402

Writing & Preference Step 3.5 Flash leads

Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138), Step 3.5 Flash: 58.8 (#113)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkSolar Pro4Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text13861403
LMArena Creative Writing13161357
LMArena Multi-Turn13851405

Frequently asked questions

Is Solar Pro4 better than Step 3.5 Flash?

Solar Pro4 and Step 3.5 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.1 vs 42.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Solar Pro4 or Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Solar Pro4 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

Is Solar Pro4 or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Solar Pro4 does, with 524K tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Solar Pro4 and Step 3.5 Flash share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Solar Pro4 has 18 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper