Model comparison
Qwen3.6 27B vs Solar Pro4
Qwen3.6 27B and Solar Pro4 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.9 vs 41.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
UpstageSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 27B leads 52.4 to 39.0.
- Solar Pro4 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $3.60 for Qwen3.6 27B.
- Solar Pro4 accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 262K.
- Qwen3.6 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen3.6 27B | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 41.9 | 41.5 |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 524K |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.60 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 11 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen3.6 27B: 38.5 (#162), Solar Pro4: 39.9 (#135)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| SciCode | 37.3% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1439 |
Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen3.6 27B: 24.4 (#148), Solar Pro4: 27.3 (#107)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0.9% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1398 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 7% | — |
| DTBench | 78.1% | — |
| LMCA | 34.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.47 | — |
Math Qwen3.6 27B leads
Qwen3.6 27B: 47.5 (#56), Solar Pro4: 36.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 35.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 91.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1418 |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 27B leads
Qwen3.6 27B: 52.4 (#58), Solar Pro4: 39.0 (#128)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 85.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1421 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen3.6 27B: —, Solar Pro4: 49.0 (#134)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1362 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1417 |
| LMArena French | — | 1403 |
| LMArena German | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1383 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1408 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen3.6 27B: —, Solar Pro4: 72.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1376 |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen3.6 27B: —, Solar Pro4: 42.0 (#125)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1379 |
Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen3.6 27B: 50.3 (#180), Solar Pro4: 56.7 (#133)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1313 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1026 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1391 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3.6 27B better than Solar Pro4?
Qwen3.6 27B and Solar Pro4 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.9 vs 41.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6 27B or Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 27B lists at $0.60 and $3.60.
Is Qwen3.6 27B or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Solar Pro4 does, with 524K tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3.6 27B and Solar Pro4 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.6 27B has 11 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.