Model comparison
Ring-2.6-1T vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 has enough public results to be ranked (#121); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Ant Group (inclusionAI)
UpstageSummary
- Ring-2.6-1T has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Ring-2.6-1T | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Ant Group (inclusionAI) | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 36.9 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2026-05-14 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 524K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7, Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | Ring-2.6-1T | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| SciCode | 42.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1437 |
| ALE-Bench | 432.57 | — |
Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads
Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1, Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | Ring-2.6-1T | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 3.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1399 |
Math Not comparable
Ring-2.6-1T: —, Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Ring-2.6-1T | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1416 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Ring-2.6-1T: —, Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Ring-2.6-1T | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1427 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Ring-2.6-1T: —, Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | Ring-2.6-1T | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1415 |
| LMArena French | — | 1397 |
| LMArena German | — | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1401 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Ring-2.6-1T: —, Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)
| Benchmark | Ring-2.6-1T | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1377 |
Long Context Not comparable
Ring-2.6-1T: —, Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)
| Benchmark | Ring-2.6-1T | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Ring-2.6-1T: —, Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Ring-2.6-1T | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1385 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Ring-2.6-1T better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 has enough public results to be ranked (#121); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Ring-2.6-1T or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (40.7 vs 40.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Ring-2.6-1T and Solar Pro4 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Ring-2.6-1T has 3 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.