Model comparison
Longcat Flash Chat vs Ring-2.6-1T
Longcat Flash Chat has enough public results to be ranked (#120); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Ant Group (inclusionAI)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Ring-2.6-1T leads 26.1 to 19.0.
Side by side
| Longcat Flash Chat | Ring-2.6-1T | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meituan | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 36.9 |
| Released | — | 2026-05-14 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87), Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1471 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |
Reasoning Ring-2.6-1T leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272), Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 43.9% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 17.7% | — |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1440 | — |
Math Not comparable
Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1454 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | — |
| LMArena French | 1456 | — |
| LMArena German | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1371 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1445 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1411 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1425 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1418 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Longcat Flash Chat better than Ring-2.6-1T?
Longcat Flash Chat has enough public results to be ranked (#120); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Longcat Flash Chat or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?
Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 40.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and Ring-2.6-1T share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.