Model comparison
QwQ-32B vs Wizardlm 70b
QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. QwQ-32B scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where QwQ-32B leads 72.6 to 56.3.
Side by side
| QwQ-32B | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 39.8 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2024-11-28 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 36 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding QwQ-32B leads
QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1333 | 1081 |
| Aider Polyglot | 20.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 44.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 72.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54.4% | — |
Reasoning QwQ-32B leads
QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1325 | 1079 |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 83.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 137.6 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.3 | — |
| LiveBench | 72% | — |
Math QwQ-32B leads
QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 1116 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 59.2% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 77.8% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 15.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1324 | — |
Multilingual QwQ-32B leads
QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1305 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1378 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1313 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1297 | 1155 |
| LMArena French | 1336 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1262 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1279 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1354 | — |
Instruction Following QwQ-32B leads
QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1093 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.8% | — |
Long Context QwQ-32B leads
QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1097 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |
Writing & Preference QwQ-32B leads
QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1329 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1314 | 1108 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 80.2% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1257 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is QwQ-32B better than Wizardlm 70b?
QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is QwQ-32B or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
QwQ-32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.4 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do QwQ-32B and Wizardlm 70b share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. QwQ-32B has 36 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.