Model comparison

QwQ-32B vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

QwQ-32B and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.4 vs 38.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

QwQ-32B Alibaba (Qwen)

39.4

Rank #153 Confirmed

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 StepFun

38.6

Rank #173 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. QwQ-32B scores higher in 5 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where QwQ-32B leads 49.0 to 39.7.
  • QwQ-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

QwQ-32B and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 specifications
QwQ-32BStep 2 16k Exp 202412
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)StepFun
Noometry Index39.438.6
Released2024-11-28—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3612

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

QwQ-32B: 34.9 (#220), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 37.9 (#170)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwQ-32BStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Coding13331316
Aider Polyglot20.9%—
BigCodeBench Instruct44.6%—
LiveBench Coding72.2%—
BigCodeBench Complete54.4%—

Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

QwQ-32B: 22.9 (#171), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 24.8 (#140)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwQ-32BStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Hard Prompts13261299
Chess Puzzles5%—
LiveBench Reasoning83.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis65%—
Epoch Capabilities Index137.6—
ForecastBench58.3—
LiveBench72%—

Math QwQ-32B leads

QwQ-32B: 36.2 (#123), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 33.6 (#171)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwQ-32BStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Math13591305
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202559.2%—
LiveBench Math77.8%—

Knowledge QwQ-32B leads

QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#150), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 34.6 (#187)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwQ-32BStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Expert13231279
GPQA Diamond65.3%—
Confabulations15.6%—

Multilingual QwQ-32B leads

QwQ-32B: 45.0 (#171), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.9 (#176)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwQ-32BStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Non-English13061290
LMArena Chinese13781331
LMArena Russian12971324
LMArena French1337—
LMArena German1313—
LMArena Japanese1263—
LMArena Korean1278—
LMArena Spanish1353—

Instruction Following QwQ-32B leads

QwQ-32B: 72.8 (#131), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 68.1 (#187)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwQ-32BStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Instruction Following12971287
LiveBench Instruction Following81.8%—

Long Context QwQ-32B leads

QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#165)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwQ-32BStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Longer Query13081307
Fiction.LiveBench83.3%—

Writing & Preference Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

QwQ-32B: 50.9 (#175), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.5 (#168)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwQ-32BStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Text13291321
LMArena Creative Writing12881328
LMArena Multi-Turn13141292
Short-Story Creative Writing80.2%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1257—
LiveBench Language51.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is QwQ-32B better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

QwQ-32B and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.4 vs 38.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is QwQ-32B or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 34.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do QwQ-32B and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. QwQ-32B has 36 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper