Noometry

Model comparison

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct vs Wizardlm 70b

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct Alibaba (Qwen)

43.0

Rank #102 Confirmed

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

33.0

Rank #249 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads 58.0 to 34.8.

Side by side

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructWizardlm 70b
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Microsoft
Noometry Index43.033.0
Released2025-09—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.50—
Output $ / M tokens$2—
Results tracked2512

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 42.5 (#98), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

BenchmarkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructWizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding14401081

Reasoning Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 31.1 (#81), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

BenchmarkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructWizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts14281079
Kagi LLM Benchmark66.7%—

Math Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 38.8 (#126), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

BenchmarkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructWizardlm 70b
LMArena Math14401116
Omni-MATH46.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.8 (#106), Wizardlm 70b: —

BenchmarkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructWizardlm 70b
MMLU-Pro78.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—
GPQA (HELM)63%—
LMArena Expert1417—

Multilingual Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.1 (#93), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

BenchmarkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructWizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English14071078
LMArena Chinese14601052
LMArena German14171083
LMArena Russian14041155
LMArena French1413—
LMArena Japanese1395—
LMArena Korean1364—
LMArena Spanish1435—

Instruction Following Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 70.8 (#159), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

BenchmarkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructWizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following13891093
IFEval81%—

Long Context Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#223), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

BenchmarkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructWizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query14031097
Fiction.LiveBench55.6%—

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.0 (#121), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

BenchmarkQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructWizardlm 70b
LMArena Text14171120
LMArena Creative Writing13341149
LMArena Multi-Turn14161108
WildBench80.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better than Wizardlm 70b?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper