Model comparison

Qwen1.5-7B vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Qwen1.5-7B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.8

Rank #270 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-7B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 55.5 to 29.8.

Side by side

Qwen1.5-7B and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
Qwen1.5-7BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.837.7
Released2024-02-042025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked1325

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Qwen1.5-7B: 31.6 (#271), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.2 (#199)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-7BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Coding11071413
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
LMArena WebDev—1275
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—41.2%
ALE-Bench—461.45
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen1.5-7B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.7 (#116)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-7BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%

Reasoning Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Qwen1.5-7B: 19.5 (#237), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 24.7 (#141)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-7BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10661372
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.5%

Math Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Qwen1.5-7B: 29.0 (#222), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 34.9 (#151)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-7BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Math10801364

Knowledge Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Qwen1.5-7B: 28.2 (#239), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.4 (#159)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-7BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Expert10551337
MMLU62.6%—

Multilingual Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Qwen1.5-7B: 28.6 (#266), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.8 (#143)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-7BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English10581345
LMArena Chinese11401356
LMArena Russian10061367
LMArena French—1394
LMArena German—1324
LMArena Japanese—1309
LMArena Korean—1307
LMArena Spanish—1360

Instruction Following Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Qwen1.5-7B: 54.4 (#276), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.8 (#142)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-7BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10581356

Long Context Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#261), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#126)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-7BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query10901379

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Qwen1.5-7B: 29.8 (#288), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.5 (#142)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen1.5-7BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text10841356
LMArena Creative Writing10351333
LMArena Multi-Turn10611365

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen1.5-7B better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen1.5-7B or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.2 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-7B and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-7B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper